Kyle Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Feel free to talk about features or ideas you have about the site or the site's content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricci Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Well I can tell you that the number one issue I've heard through PM is the limits on attachments and managing images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted May 17, 2016 Author Share Posted May 17, 2016 I'm thinking we need to shift the content from the forum to perhaps a user supplied system on db.com and then allow for forum comments on the bottoms of the pages. Users could create pages for bass content (movies) and upload images. This is a little better for scaling because the forums are expensive and space is very limited. thoughts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxmercy Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 How will the data transfer for the now-large movie databass be done? The new format sounds promising. JSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricci Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 We definitely don't want to lose the content we have or mess it up. That would be a huge setback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted May 18, 2016 Author Share Posted May 18, 2016 The content won't be lost. My thoughts are. - create a new system that is a clear improvement over the old - start using the new system - create a migration process for older data once new system looks like a clear advantage. we sorta have this problem with the db.com data too because the new system does not use MySQL so there data won't just go into the new database without a migration process. It won't be easy but once we're into the new system we'll be much better off long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samps Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Could you make a blank comparison graph that would let you pick any two drivers to compare? Currently you have to select a single driver then pick another to compare. Even better if you could pick three or four to compare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infrasonic Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Could you make a blank comparison graph that would let you pick any two drivers to compare? Currently you have to select a single driver then pick another to compare. Even better if you could pick three or four to compare. I am also interested in this kind of functionality for the compare graphs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hifisound Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 A minor point, but it might be better to have more columns in the main table at http://www.data-bass.com/systems Enclosure type, number of drivers, DIY/commercial (instead it being part of name or driver column ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricci Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 We are planning to be able to sort by "turn-key" or closed loop system versus passive with the big amp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted July 11, 2016 Author Share Posted July 11, 2016 Could you make a blank comparison graph that would let you pick any two drivers to compare? Currently you have to select a single driver then pick another to compare. Even better if you could pick three or four to compare. Yes, are you talking about drivers or systems or both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted July 11, 2016 Author Share Posted July 11, 2016 A minor point, but it might be better to have more columns in the main table at http://www.data-bass.com/systems Enclosure type, number of drivers, DIY/commercial (instead it being part of name or driver column ) yep, thats a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.