Jump to content

Bulding the Room2 listening room


Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, SME said:

Thanks for creating and posting these samples.  Can you explain a bit more about the reasoning that went into creating the particular filter response shape?  Is this supposed to be group delay related to some kind of filter (e.g. crossover), an in-room acoustic effect, or something else?  FWIW, I definitely notice a difference between the 100 ms and original with a clear reduction of impact.  Between the 20 ms and original, I think I notice a very slight reduction in impact, but I'd want to do blinded A/B/X to be confident.

Now having said this, there is a big caveat with your study because there's a big difference between GD applied electronically and GD that arises from acoustic effects.  That's why I asked my first question above.  Time and time again, engineers try to treat room acoustics as a "linear transform along a wire", when this is not the case at all.  The ears and body are capable of sampling pressure at multiple locations (the ears and tactile), and the brain is very well adapted to parsing the content of the source  (both time and frequency aspects!) from what could be a very messy sound-field with dramatic local variations in measured frequency response and group delay.  So in general, electronic changes may be far far more audible than FR and GD features of similar magnitude that appear in in-room measurements.

Another potential caveat here.  You indicate that the frequency response of your filters "is reasonably flat, considered below threshold for audibility".  I can't comment with certainty in your specific case, but in general, I would not be surprised if the frequency response changes you show were well above the audibility threshold on a system with strong accurate bass.    This alone could have substantially affected the amount of perceived impact.  Again, there is a big difference between filters applied electronically and influence of acoustics on measured sound vs. perception.  Depending on the circumstances, I believe the brain can pick out excruciatingly small changes, likely below 0.01 dB for bass.  These can be perceived most readily on transients.

Regardless of the audibility of your filters, this experiment says little about the audibility of characteristics arising from room acoustics or whether it's necessary to "correct" the group delay deviations seen in in-room measurements.  I can't emphasize enough how important it is to keep this distinguish in mind clearly when optimizing response.

Also a comment about the sample material.  The kick seemed a bit soft, diffuse, and fluttery to begin with, and it didn't really sound consistent between beats.  Audacity spec analysis suggests that the kick has some high Q ringing at various frequencies, which also does not appear to be consistent between different beats.  Differences in group delay might be a lot more apparent on tighter transients that don't ring so much.

I chose processing that resembles some of the problems I see in measurements from systems around. I have some measurements from customers now, and some of those follow the calibration process from start until the customer reaches the crossing between bored and good enough.

Some subwoofers introduce so high gd it is impossible to correct for in ordinary av-processors/receivers. Then there is the room.

Yes, I could do a better job with frequency response accuracy.

Sample material was quickly chosen, drums with more dry character may be easier to hear - or, may be not. Must try it, to confirm. But my reasoning was, that if it shuold be possible to hear on normal music with transient drums,

I have updated the article 2 times, with comments, and new sample files.

Thank you for taking time to listen to this, and it is interesting to see your impression is close to my own experience. I suspect it is required to have a very good bass-system with decent response - both frequency and timing - to hear this.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I agree with much of what you say. I've thought about this for a while. Frequency response of subwoofers should have an output rating attached with it to keep th

I have posted about the new Room2 in the bass punch threshold thread, and announced that I would start a thread on the building of this room.   I plan to present a complete article describing what t

Nice.  It makes me recall the conversation I had last time I visited my doctor, who had heard from my wife that I was doing a lot of work in audio. Our conversation went kind of like this: D

Posted Images

21 hours ago, SME said:

I believe these group delay shifts are pretty modest.  IIRC, an ideal LR4 at 80 Hz has excess delay in the 5-10 ms range.  I used to think that getting more energy in the first arrival is important for the most intense slam, but I now believe that the experience of tactile slam is actually a very high level perception.

My thinking is that the brain samples information from both ears and vibro-tactile receptors and then applies sophisticated "room correction" processing to this information in order to reconstruct an accurate estimate of the actual time-frequency aspects of the original sound.  In my own room, as I tighten up the bass response accuracy, the sound and tactile sensation I perceive become remarkably more uniform throughout the room, despite what the localized measurements suggest.  If accurate enough, one can get an extremely tight "thump inside the body" effect that is more like what one experiences with a powerful system outdoors.

I'll hopefully be soon exploring this in other rooms and am particularly interested to see what I can do in tiny pathological rooms.

Yes, the crossover turns phase 90 deg for each pole, and the resulting delay is not that large compared to what room reflections can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

A lot has happened since the last update here. I mainly use facebook to post short messages and pictures of what is going on now, and articles are on my web site in the blog-section, products on the product page. Which means no focus on updating this thread.

A new very small speaker has been developed, it was due for launch and presentation, and then you-know-what arrived as a free gift from someone I am not very pleased about at the moment.

So launch is now postponed indefinitely, until people are able to show interest in speakers and sound again.

The new F205 has a preview page, those interested will find it on the products page, link to preview is on the F205 page.

The goal for F205 was to create a very small speaker with sound properties similar to large systems, with as few compromises as possible. The result has surprised me a bit. Since I had my F205 pair installed in Room2, I have not reconnected the larger F2, and have no urge to do so. In fact, after installing the first pair for testing, I found I really missed them after shipping them off. They are addictive. 

The F205 has the same character of clarity and transparency and dynamics as the larger F2, but it is more neutral and the highs are in a different league. Kind of like a huge horn speaker without the coloration, like a sophisticated electrostatic or magnestat with no limits in spl.

A picture from Room2, the F205 in front:

F205_1600_1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...