Jump to content

Infrasonic

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    942

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Infrasonic

  1. Infrasonic
    Excellent stuff, Josh! It's fun to start seeing one system compared to itself with different amps. Sometimes the results can make one system look like something entirely different! The T3 system, for example. The original test makes it look like a HE uber woofer will screaming top end and drooping low end. The new test makes it look like a smoother 'subwoofer' type response. (I know there is a lot more to it than that, just keeping it simple) Very cool. Wonder how the MAUL will graph out with the SP amps. If you do that one too, I mean.
  2. Infrasonic
    Good question. I use the "rule of thumb" type modelling when I use Unibox. The severity of compression is worsened with smaller surface area. Ie: smaller port/vent, easier for compression to set in. I'm no expert at all. Just use good sense when designing. I would like to see if there is a way to really "model" it though. The smarter guys here will know im sure.
  3. Infrasonic
    Can you test 2ohm per channel, Luke? I'm guessing it will be half the bridged numbers.
  4. Infrasonic
    Damn right.
  5. Infrasonic
    Or just as good... "Subwoofers aren't 'musical'." No. Your shitty room and system setup is "not musical". (not YOU MemX, but those guys....)
  6. Infrasonic
    I know, right?!?! Magical super woofer!
  7. Infrasonic
    Haha! Well first of all... I'd love to but I can't. That response does not exist anymore. I've changed it already. Do you want a copy of my current FR? And... I have no idea what "file" to send you. I can...umm...take a pic, like I do. My second most recent FR is in the link in my sig. Second post. Already changed that too.
  8. Infrasonic
    Huh? It was just a one-octave smoothed graph illustrating a comparison to the "preferred" FR shape Max was commenting about. Of course the full un-smoothed response does not look like that.
  9. Infrasonic
    Probably nothing special but let's hope I'm wrong. Btw, did any one do 13 Hours?
  10. Infrasonic
    Pretty sure he is just plain busy and doesn't have much time for the forum(s). But he's still around.
  11. Infrasonic
    Oh definitely. Just wondering where you had sourced your copy from. While the movie was terrible to most, I enjoyed it for some odd reason. I'll check out the retail copy when I get a chance.
  12. Infrasonic
    Dave, was that a rental? I remember you doing another movie (one of the Divergent movies?) and you had way less bass but someone with the actual copy of the movie had a different mix with a lot more ULF. Maybe the same thing happening?
  13. Infrasonic
    Ah, sorry. Thought they were dual coil 1ohm.
  14. Infrasonic
    How come not used in 4ohm and bridge the K20? Either way... wow.
  15. Infrasonic
    Yeah. Looks impressive with some pretty stout specs. Not sure if it would really "best" the 152. I think this one is even more of a bass/midbass when compared to the 152 though. Even B&C recommends a small/medium resonant enclosure tuned to 40hz.
  16. Infrasonic
    One octave smoothed graph of my main FR.
  17. Infrasonic
  18. Infrasonic
    Why you no use deez??!?!?!?!?!?!?
  19. Infrasonic
    So probably not very low then.
  20. Infrasonic
    PEQ boost in the area where it is compressing the most.
  21. Infrasonic
    Probably just to facilitate easier hookup of multiple enclosures per channel. Surprised there is no Speakon output jack.
  22. Infrasonic
    Woah! New site, new product and new prices. Hell yeah!
  23. Infrasonic
    Is it possible that by design the SP's are capable of lots of current but not wide enough voltage swings? Isn't your K20 a voltage monster?
  24. Infrasonic
    Is that a ridiculous expectation? What happened to you? You used to be cool, Luke.
  25. Infrasonic
    You have no excuse now.
×
×
  • Create New...