Good job Mr. Ricci!
Were the CEA-2010 Max Burst numbers taken with the LF adjust at minimum or at the maximum?
Data-bass says that "The 4000-ULF was run with the LF adjust at minimum for the rest of the measurements because this is closer to the native response with the least amount of boosting to the low frequencies."
So my understand is that the CEA-2010 Max Burst numbers were taken with LF adjust at 'minimum'. Therefore, with LF adjust at maximum, the CEA-2010 Max Burst numbers should be even higher!